Airport Control Center, Arizona

Airport Control Center, Arizona
Case Study Description:

Airport Control Center | Located in Arizona

In brief, the Airport Control Center located at Sky Harbor in Arizona involves design and construction of the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport New Emergency Command Center and AEOC Building for improved operational efficiency.

Services Offered

Having a remarkable track record of successfully delivering MEP Pump room coordination works, AEODC was awarded the project to create the Revit ASMEP model at LOD 350 of the existing MEP Pump room, which would be used by the Client to analyze and coordinate the re-installation of new MEP equipment to cater to the increased load, all within a tight 2.0 to 3.0 week time-frame.

The scope of work included in the project:

Revit Modeling:
Creating detailed 3D models of architecture, structure, and MEP systems with precision.

Extraction of CD Set:
Preparation of existing arrangement of Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing system.

Project Challenges

The project presented several complex challenges, including:

Tight Deadlines:
Given the nature of project ‘Airport Control Center’, very limited time was available to upgrade the MEP Pump room calling for accurate planning implementing BIM Technology.

Design Complexity:
The existing MEP Pump room design drawings were not detailed enough to understand the flow of system.

Strategies Implemented

The strategies implemented for successfully delivering the project:

Optimized Workflows:
Leveraging advanced Revit tools and streamlined workflows to maximize productivity.

Collaborative Approach:
Fostering strong collaboration between the design team and the construction team to ensure timely issue resolution.

Quality Assurance:
Implementing rigorous quality control measures to maintain accuracy and consistency throughout the project.

By successfully addressing these challenges, AEODC delivered a complex MEP Pump Room BIM Modeling Scope that facilitated efficient demolition, re-construction minimizing costly errors and delays in record time at site.

Key Facts

View key facts for "Airport Control Center, Arizona".

Business Impact

  • 50% Faster Project Delivery
  • 30% Fewer Site Errors
  • 25% Reduced Rework Costs

Client Name

Completion Year

Project Type

Tools Used in the Case Study

Discover which tools and technologies were used for "Airport Control Center, Arizona".

Revit

Autodesk Revit is a Building Information Modeling (BIM) software platform used by architects, engineers, contractors, and AEC teams to design, document, coordinate, and deliver building projects. Unlike traditional CAD software, Revit connects 3D building elements with plans, sections, elevations, schedules, quantities, and project data in one coordinated model. Its key features include parametric modeling, multidisciplinary collaboration, construction documentation, worksharing, visualization, and model-based scheduling. Explore Revit pricing, free trial options, major features, use cases, pros and cons, system compatibility, and the best Revit alternatives to determine whether it is the right BIM software for your workflow.

Revit

NavisWorks

Autodesk Navisworks is [BIM coordination software](https://www.aecplustech.com/tools/category/clash-detection) for combining multidisciplinary design and construction files into a federated model. Contractors, BIM/VDC teams, and design coordinators use it to review constructability, run clash detection in Navisworks Manage, link models to schedules, and share review outputs. It is not a modeling replacement for Revit or AutoCAD; its role is to bring project data together for coordination and delivery.

NavisWorks

AutoCAD

AutoCAD is a leading computer-aided design software used by architects, engineers, contractors, and designers for precise 2D drafting, 3D modeling, documentation, and technical drawings. This AutoCAD review covers its key features, common AEC use cases, pricing, subscription options, and free trial availability. You can also explore how AutoCAD is used across architecture, engineering, and construction, compare its strengths and limitations, and discover the best AutoCAD alternatives for different workflows, budgets, and project requirements.

AutoCAD

User Experience

View user experience for "Airport Control Center, Arizona".

Why this tool/tech was selected

The primary reason for choosing BIM technology and Autodesk Revit was the need to accurately model and coordinate the existing MEP Pump Room within an extremely tight 2–3 week project timeline. The available design drawings lacked sufficient detail to clearly understand existing Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing system layouts, making traditional coordination methods inefficient and prone to errors. Developing a Revit ASMEP model at LOD 350 provided a detailed digital representation of existing conditions and enabled the project team to analyze equipment locations, system routing, spatial constraints, and coordination requirements before construction. The solution also improved collaboration between design and construction teams, supported efficient demolition and re-installation planning, and helped minimize site conflicts, rework, costly errors, and construction delays. By leveraging BIM modeling, Revit MEP coordination, and LOD 350 modeling, AEODC was able to deliver reliable project information quickly while supporting improved operational efficiency at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport.

Challenges the Client Faced before

  • Incomplete and outdated MEP drawings
  • Difficulty understanding system routing
  • Limited visibility of existing site conditions
  • Manual MEP coordination and clash identification
  • High risk of site coordination errors
  • Potential rework and construction delays
  • Difficulty coordinating new MEP equipment
  • Very tight 2–3 week project timeline
  • Limited collaboration between project teams
  • Risk of costly demolition and reconstruction changes

The previous method used

The previous method relied primarily on conventional 2D CAD drawings, manual measurement, and document-based coordination to understand the existing MEP Pump Room conditions. Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing systems were reviewed separately, making it difficult to visualize system routing, equipment clearances, and spatial conflicts in a complex airport environment. Since the existing drawings lacked sufficient detail, the project team had to spend additional time interpreting information and validating site conditions manually. Coordination between design and construction teams was also more dependent on drawings, meetings, and manual markups. This approach increased the risk of coordination errors, rework, construction delays, and costly site changes, particularly under the project's demanding 2–3 week delivery schedule.

Time / Money saved & the Business Impact.

The implementation of BIM technology and Autodesk Revit significantly improved project efficiency, coordination, and cost control for the Airport Control Center MEP Pump Room upgrade. Developing a detailed Revit ASMEP model at LOD 350 gave the client a reliable digital representation of existing Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing systems, reducing the time required for manual interpretation and coordination. The BIM-based workflow enabled the team to identify spatial constraints and potential clashes before construction, helping minimize site errors, rework, material wastage, and costly changes during demolition and reconstruction. It also supported faster communication and decision-making between the design and construction teams. Most importantly, the project was successfully delivered within the demanding 2–3 week timeframe, helping the client avoid schedule overruns. The resulting efficiencies improved construction planning, reduced coordination risks, and generated cost savings by preventing avoidable site issues and rework.

Customer Quote

-

Original Case Study

-