Douglas Enclave, Florida

The primary reason for selecting this tool was its ability to seamlessly integrate architecture, structure, and MEP data into a unified, highly coordinated digital environment. In complex residential and mixed-use developments, traditional coordination workflows often lead to errors, inefficiencies, and delays. By adopting an advanced BIM-based toolset, the project team ensured a streamlined process that significantly improved clarity, accuracy, and communication across all disciplines. This solution was chosen because it supports precise model development at higher Levels of Detail (LOD), enabling stakeholders to visualize potential conflicts early and resolve them before construction begins. Its powerful clash detection, real-time coordination features, and ability to manage large-scale datasets made it ideal for a fast-paced project like Douglas Enclave. Additionally, the tool enhances collaboration by allowing teams to share updates instantly, maintain version control, and track project issues systematically through integrated platforms such as Navisworks and Procore. Another major driver behind choosing this solution was the need to deliver within an extremely tight 8–9 week timeframe. The tool’s capability to automate repetitive tasks, generate sheet sets efficiently, and reduce manual rework contributed directly to accelerating the project timeline. By leveraging this technology, AEODC ensured higher accuracy, reduced risks, and delivered a fully coordinated model that supported smooth and conflict-free construction execution.

Reliance on 2D drawings caused frequent design conflicts. Manual clash detection led to errors and delays. Poor coordination and version control slowed decision-making. High rework costs due to late identification of clashes. Traditional workflow couldn’t meet tight project deadlines.

Before adopting the advanced BIM-based solution, the project relied heavily on traditional 2D CAD workflows for design coordination and documentation. Architectural, structural, and MEP teams worked in separate drawing environments, often exchanging files through email or manual file-sharing methods. This fragmented approach made it difficult to maintain version control, leading to frequent inconsistencies between drawings and late discovery of design conflicts. Clash detection was largely manual, performed by overlaying 2D drawings, which increased the likelihood of errors and delayed issue identification. Coordination meetings required more time, as discrepancies had to be reviewed line-by-line without a centralized model to reference. Construction teams often encountered unforeseen site conflicts because the 2D-based process lacked the spatial clarity and depth provided by a 3D model. Documentation updates were also time-consuming. Any design change required multiple teams to revise their drawings individually, resulting in duplicated efforts and slower turnaround times. This traditional method was not efficient for projects with tight deadlines, high complexity, or dense MEP layouts—making it clear that a more robust and integrated digital process was necessary. By transitioning from these conventional 2D workflows to a coordinated BIM environment, AEODC significantly improved accuracy, collaboration, and overall project delivery efficiency.

Implementing this advanced BIM toolset delivered significant and measurable business impact across project workflows, cost efficiency, and overall delivery performance. One of the most notable outcomes was the substantial reduction in design errors and on-site clashes. By performing automated clash detection in a coordinated 3D environment, the team identified and resolved more than 30–40% of potential conflicts during preconstruction. This resulted in major savings in rework costs, material wastage, and labor hours that would otherwise be spent fixing issues at site. Time efficiency was another key benefit. The tool enabled faster modeling, automated documentation, and smoother interdisciplinary coordination, allowing AEODC to deliver a fully coordinated LOD 350 package within an 8–9 week timeframe, compared to the traditional 12–14 weeks typically required using 2D CAD workflows. This accelerated timeline improved client satisfaction, increased AEODC’s capacity to take on additional projects, and enhanced overall operational productivity. From a financial standpoint, the ROI was clear. By reducing coordination delays, minimizing rework, and streamlining model management, AEODC achieved cost savings of nearly 25–30% on internal production hours. The improved accuracy also lowered the risk of expensive site modifications, benefiting both the client and the construction team. Beyond cost and time savings, the technology significantly improved communication, transparency, and decision-making. Stakeholders gained real-time visibility into model updates, issue tracking, and clash resolutions, resulting in a more predictable and controlled project environment. Overall, the adoption of this BIM solution delivered measurable ROI, strengthened AEODC’s competitive advantage, and ensured higher-quality project outcomes with fewer risks and delays.

-

-