Mummadpura Flyover

• Live 4D BIM-linked progress tracking
• Automated weekly/monthly reports
• Faster onsite issue resolution

AUDA and its project team selected VisiLean because a project of this scale, a major flyover on Ahmedabad's outer ring road, needed a single platform where the BIM model and actual site progress stayed connected, rather than living in separate drawings and spreadsheets. VisiLean linked BIM model elements to executable tasks, so updates reported from the site were reflected directly on the model, giving the team a live 4D view of construction rather than a static schedule that quickly went out of date.

The platform's Planned vs. Actual slider was a particular draw: it let project managers visually compare where construction was supposed to be against where it actually stood, at any point, without digging through separate reports. VisiLean also automated the generation of weekly and monthly progress reports, complete with model visualizations and site images, and let the team log site constraints directly through the mobile app so the relevant stakeholders could see and resolve them quickly.

Before VisiLean, the project team lacked a single integrated platform where the entire flyover project could be visualized at scale, making it harder to get a clear, current picture of how construction was actually progressing against plan. Onsite issues that could become blockers were often identified later than they should have been, since there was no live link between what was happening on site and the project's BIM model.

Generating daily progress reports was itself a manual, time-consuming task, requiring the team to compile site data, photos, and status updates from multiple sources by hand for every reporting cycle. That manual process made it harder to keep stakeholders current on a large, multi-year infrastructure project where conditions on the outer ring road could change quickly.

Before adopting VisiLean, a project of the Mummadpura Flyover's scale would typically have been tracked through separate 2D drawings, spreadsheets, and periodic site reports that were not directly linked to a 3D or 4D model. Comparing planned progress against actual site conditions meant manually cross-referencing a static schedule with whatever updates had come in from the field, rather than viewing both together in one place.

Daily and monthly progress reports would have been compiled by hand, pulling together site photos, status updates, and schedule data from multiple sources, a process that took time away from the team and left more room for the information to be out of date by the time it reached decision-makers. Site issues and constraints would similarly have been reported through informal channels or paperwork rather than logged directly against the model.

Linking the BIM model directly to executable site tasks gave the Mummadpura Flyover team a live 4D view of construction, so project status was always visible on the model rather than locked away in a separate report that needed to be manually updated. That live connection made it far easier for AUDA and the project team to spot issues early, before they became blockers to the wider construction schedule.

Automating daily and monthly progress reports removed a recurring manual task from the team's workload: reports that once had to be compiled by hand from site data, photos, and status updates were instead generated automatically, freeing time for the team to focus on managing the work itself rather than documenting it. The Planned vs. Actual slider gave project managers an immediate, visual way to see how construction compared to schedule at any point, without cross-referencing separate documents.

Constraint reporting directly through the LiveSite mobile app also shortened the path from an issue being identified on site to it being resolved, since the relevant stakeholders could see and act on logged constraints as soon as they were reported rather than waiting for the next periodic update.